|
|
Stressors/Threats
|
Relevance to Species
|
HABITAT LOSS
|
|
breeding
|
Breeds in areas with low or no vegetation, large open areas such as agricultural fields and "wasteland"; historic breeding areas were largely associated with prairie dog towns, and burrowing owls have lost habitat with the widespread eradication of prairie dogs and other burrowing rodents. Loss of breeding habitat is considered to be the most critically important threat, as areas that support burrowing owls in Arizona are largely private lands that are being developed. Need to have several suitable holes in close proximity, plus some structural diversity such as trees, poles, fences for perching.
|
dispersal
|
loss of areas with holes for roosting may be significant. Can use areas that are not as open as breeding areas, and has remarkable ability to find holes.
|
foraging
|
size of foraging area is unknown, may be related to available food supply, differs seasonally and in life cycle of species; diversity of resources is important
|
wintering
|
winters in this area, needs foraging and roosting sites, some winter on breeding area, others move about and settle in new areas either temporarily or for a longer period
|
migratory stops
|
roosts in holes for days to weeks during migration and dispersal; Santa Cruz River is a migratory corridor
|
diurnal preferences - day, temporary
|
may use some short term roosts
|
diurnal preferences - day, long-term
|
generally remains near its burrow; forages by day in general vicinity of burrow
|
diurnal preferences - night
|
probably remains in its burrow
|
fire threat
|
fire may improve habitat by clearing vegetation; unintended fires may result in loss of habitat
|
HABITAT ALTERATION
|
|
prey
|
Consumes diverse prey: insects, rodents, small birds. Habitat diversity provides for a variety of prey items, anything that reduces diversity is bad.
|
nest sites
|
uses holes in the ground, ranging from rodent burrows to solution cavities, other erosional features, and artificial burrows, but value of artificial burrows has not been well researched
|
HABITAT ALTERATION continued
|
vegetation composition/density
|
prefers low density vegetation, but some locations have had higher density, especially for wintering locations; needs some vegetation species and structural diversity
|
habitat conversion
|
much of this species current habitat is being developed for housing and that is not suitable, or not as suitable, as agricultural lands; mesquite and bufflegrass invasion may also be a problem on inactive agricultural lands
|
escape cover
|
needs some protection from raptors; females use burrows, males use shade
|
fragmentation
|
appears to adapt well to a fragmented environment by finding suitable patches that are spread across the landscape; extent and degree of fragmentation that this species can tolerate is not known
|
invasive plant species
|
invasion by mesquite and bufflegrass is probably bad for this species, there have apparently been losses of burrowing owls in the Avra Valley that are contemporary with mesquite and bufflegrass invasion of inactive agricultural fields
|
invasive animal species
|
unknown
|
habitat rehabilitation potential
|
probably good, uses a variety of developed areas, but the widespread use of artificial burrows has not been studied over time; control of invasive plants may be beneficial
|
contaminants
|
unknown
|
nutrient enrichment
|
probably irrelevant
|
water accessibility
|
not considered a problem
|
drought
|
may result in reduction of prey populations
|
flood
|
may have adverse effects on burrows and prey
|
groundwater depletion
|
not considered a problem
|
root zone water loss
|
not considered a problem
|
artificial water sources
|
not known to use
|
infiltration
|
not a problem
|
runoff
|
may result in flooding of burrows or prey burrows
|
edge effects
|
Edges are not considered good, this bird prefers large blocks of open habitat with few perches for larger raptors
|
HABITAT ALTERATION continued
|
water quality - turbidity
|
apparently irrelevant
|
water quality - salinity
|
apparently irrelevant
|
water quality - conductivity
|
apparently irrelevant
|
water quality - dissolved oxygen
|
apparently irrelevant
|
water quality - effluent
|
apparently irrelevant
|
sheetflow disruption
|
may result in eventual improvement of habitat on downstream side by allowing rodents to invade areas that had previously been flooded; may also be detrimental on upstream side by encouraging mesquite and bufflegrass invasion
|
flow rate
|
apparently irrelevant
|
land use history
|
prefers areas of open land, such as inactive agricultural fields
|
roads - dust
|
not considered a problem
|
roads - erosion
|
may benefit by creating burrows, but may also result in loss of burrows
|
roads - surface water diversion/ponding
|
may result in eventual improvement of habitat on downstream side by allowing rodents to invade areas that previously flooded; may be detrimental on upstream side by encouraging mesquite and bufflegrass invasion
|
roads - asphalt/contaminants
|
unknown
|
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
|
|
dispersal mechanism
|
uses burrows that it finds during dispersal flights, sometimes in habitat that may not be suitable for long term residence
|
behavior traits
|
tends to be a conspicuous target for shooters and raptors
|
habitat rehabilitation potential
|
may be fairly easy to create and/or rehabilitate habitat, but concern is that good BUOW habitat is not good for some other species of concern or especially aesthetically pleasing, plus continued vigilance against invasive species is needed.
|
colonization potential
|
known to be able to locate isolated areas of suitable habitat
|
effective population size
|
unknown
|
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS continued
|
total population size
|
unknown but thought to be declining because of habitat loss
|
fecundity
|
not considered a problem
|
knowledge/data on species
|
essentially nothing is known about demographics or population dynamics
|
seasonal specialization
|
not considered a problem
|
captive breeding/translocation potential
|
translocations are practiced widely, but not adequately studied
|
genetic isolation
|
unknown
|
inbreeding
|
unknown
|
diurnal specialization
|
not considered to be a problem
|
off-site mortality - migratory
|
no information is available
|
off-site mortality - from surrounding land uses
|
no information is available
|
breadth of resource use
|
prey is plentiful and diverse, but concentrations of prey animals are patchy; nesting and roosting habitat is uncommon, declining, and critically important
|
sensitivity to disturbance
|
considered sensitive to disturbance, although some individuals habituate to frequent disturbance
|
adaptability
|
fairly limited in habitat selection
|
charisma
|
Fairly charismatic and popular
|
INTERSPECIFIC FACTORS
|
|
predation
|
Highly susceptible to predation by raptors, does not thrive in areas with high raptor concentrations or perches for raptors
|
disease
|
susceptible to West Nile Virus and known to be killed by it, but effects of WNV on individuals and populations is unknown at present; other diseases are unknown
|
pollinators/seed dispersers
|
NA
|
competition
|
may be subject to competition for burrows from rock squirrels and snakes
|
brood parasitism
|
not considered a problem
|
domestic/feral animals
|
may be preyed on by cats and harassed by dogs
|
invasive species
|
effects unknown, invasive plants alter habitat adversely
|
ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS
|
|
edge effect
|
prefers large blocks of relatively barren soil or low vegetation, does not benefit by edges, and may be harmed if edges attract raptors
|
disease
|
unknown, but see above
|
fire threat
|
fire may improve habitat by clearing vegetation; unintended fires may result in loss of habitat
|
off-road vehicles - dust
|
not considered a problem
|
off-road vehicles - erosion
|
possibly may result in habitat loss, crushing of burrows or impacts to prey
|
off-road vehicles - noise
|
disturbance may be a problem if frequent
|
mining
|
not considered a problem
|
passive recreation
|
not considered a problem
|
grazing - vegetation impacts
|
may be beneficial if it prevents growth of new vegetation
|
grazing - soil impacts
|
not considered a problem
|
collection/hunting
|
not considered a problem, except illegal target shooting
|
herbicides
|
not thought to be a problem, except as they may affect prey base
|
insecticides
|
not thought to be a problem, except as they may affect prey base
|
pesticides - impacts to species
|
not considered a problem, species is short-lived, does not have a known bioaccumulation problem
|
pesticides - impacts to prey
|
insecticides may reduce prey base; historic use of rodenticides led to loss of prairie dogs and decline of this species; present use of rodenticides may be a serious problem for this species
|
direct take/mortality
|
not considered a problem
|
noise
|
may be a problem if frequent disturbance occurs
|
light
|
effects unknown, not considered a problem
|
movement
|
may be a problem if frequent disturbance occurs
|
ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS continued
|
landscaping
|
could be beneficial if low density vegetation and minimal raptor perches are part of the landscaping of large sites; known to do well in some parks, parkways, and golf courses
|
invasives
|
buffelgrass may be bad, mesquite invasion is bad
|
domestic/feral animals
|
may be a problem, especially predation by cats
|
dumping
|
not considered a problem
|
undocumented immigrants
|
may cause repeated disturbance in nesting areas
|
increased road density
|
not considered a problem except that it may result in loss of habitat
|
road kill
|
may be a problem, not well documented
|
electrocution on powerlines/towers
|
not considered a problem but birds may occasionally collide with towers
|
CONNECTIVITY
|
|
fragmentation
|
lives in a fragmented landscape, but prefers fairly large blocks of open country
|
barriers
|
unknown
|
traffic volumes
|
not considered a problem
|
wash incision
|
may be beneficial if it results in creation of new habitat, and may be harmful is burrows are lost
|
corridor width
|
probably irrelevant
|
habitat patchiness
|
good habitat is large patches of minimal vegetation
|
riparian/upland connection
|
not considered a problem, except if "restoration" is done in a way that causes loss of burrows and habitat
|
road crossings
|
not considered a problem
|
road width
|
not considered a problem
|
vegetation next to roads
|
may be a problem
|
|
|
Stressors/Threats
|
Relevance to Species
|
HABITAT LOSS
|
foraging
|
size of foraging area is unknown, but will forage over large distances; thought to prefer "edges" of habitat
|
wintering
|
winter roosts are generally caves or mines, threatened by closure
|
migratory stops
|
roosts are necessary for migrants
|
diurnal preferences - day, temporary
|
unknown and unlikely
|
diurnal preferences - day, long-term
|
caves and mines are extremely important
|
diurnal preferences - night
|
needed, includes bridges, buildings, drainage culverts?, and other unknown
|
fire threat
|
probably minor
|
HABITAT ALTERATION
|
prey
|
moths, 3-10 mm, Noctuidae; but includes other insects; loss of prey= loss of bats
|
nest sites
|
maternity roosts critically important
|
vegetation composition/density
|
important as source of prey; protect riparian and other edges
|
fragmentation
|
potentially does not matter, it lives in a fragmented landscape
|
invasive plant species
|
unknown, probably affects prey base
|
habitat rehabilitaion potential
|
limited for roosts; conditions needed are generally unknown; gating roosts could be beneficial
|
contaminents
|
unknown; there is some indication that bats can acquire toxic materials in roosts, and considerable evidence that some species can acquire toxic doses of insecticides by consuming contaminated prey
|
water accessibility
|
drinks from and forages over water; very small water sources are used, large water bodies have not been surveyed; could benefit by vegetation around water
|
artifical water sources
|
drinks from and forages over water; very small water sources are used, large water bodies have not been surveyed; could benefit by vegetation around water
|
edge effects
|
prefers foraging along edges
|
fire threat
|
may affect prey
|
water quality - turbidity
|
broadly tolerant of water quality
|
flow rate
|
may prefer still or slow moving water
|
roads - surface water diversion/ponding
|
may be beneficial
|
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
|
behavior traits
|
sensitive to disturbance at roosts
|
habitat rehabiitation potential
|
potential to increase prey base; could benefit by gating mines and caves; experiment with creating habitat?
|
fecundity
|
1 young per year, fecundity is low as with most bats
|
captive breeding/translocation potential
|
no success with moving from roosts
|
inbreeding
|
very low variability suggests inbreeding or small gene pool
|
off-site mortality - from surrounding land uses
|
could be driven from areas by renewed mining, urban expansion, human disturbance
|
sensitivity to disturbance
|
highly sensitive; outreach to recreational cavers and mine explorers is needed
|
adaptibility
|
not very adaptable to some changes, especially loss of roosts
|
charisma
|
mixed bag: bats have had a major change in public image in past two decades but some people still fear or hate; need to empasize that they eat pest insects
|
INTERSPECIFIC FACTORS
|
predation
|
limited knowledge; may be subject to predation by cats but this is not likely
|
disease
|
rabies may affect; others unknown
|
competition
|
unknown; has been found in roosts with other species
|
domestic/feral animals
|
may be preyed on by cats, but this is not likely
|
ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS
|
edge effect
|
edges are prefered foraging sites
|
off-road vehicles - dust
|
ORVs may be a problem because they get people to roost sites and result in disturbance
|
mining
|
renewed mining in areas with old mines may result in disturbance or loss of roosts
|
passive recreation
|
disturbance of roosts; should route trails to avoid roosts
|
grazing - vegetation impacts
|
may affect prey base
|
collection/hunting
|
not thought to be a problem
|
herbicides
|
not thought to be a problem, except as they may affect prey base
|
insecticides
|
impacts have been reduced over time, but still may be a problem
|
pesticides - impacts to species
|
impacts have been reduced over time, but still may be a problem
|
pesticides - impacts to prey
|
this could be significant
|
direct take/mortality
|
little effect except from mine hazard abatement practices, which could be serious impacts; road paving and de-icing may affect
|
light
|
bright lights near roosts may affect
|
landscaping
|
native plants could provide beneficial opportunities for habitat improvement
|
dumping
|
may affect if in roost sites
|
undocumented immigrants
|
may affect when they use caves and mines for shelter or dumping grounds
|
increased road density
|
may be a problem, low-flying bats could get hit by cars while foraging along road edges
|
road kill
|
may be a problem, low-flying bats could get hit by cars while foraging along road edges
|
CONNECTIVITY
|
barriers
|
large cities with abundant lights could be barriers
|
traffic volumes
|
increased volume could lead to increased road kill
|
wash incision
|
could create roost sites but could also take some away
|
corridor width
|
buffers along washes would be good but width unknown
|
habitat patchiness
|
depend on what is around them; patchiness could be good because it could increase insect diversity
|
riparian/upland connection
|
bridges could be improved as bat roosts
|
road crossings
|
could be opportunity for foraging or hazard due to roadkill
|
vegetation next to roads
|
could be opportunity or hazard; recommend not planting edges along larger and faster roads, allow space between trees and roads
|