|
|
Stressors/Threats
|
Relevance to Species
|
HABITAT LOSS
|
|
breeding
|
Loss of habitat to agricultural and urban development is regarded as most serious historic threat to the species. Loss continues today, to a lesser degree, as urban development occurs in previously undeveloped land that may still support this species.
|
dispersal
|
Dispersal is limited for a small snake. The ability to disperse has been compromised by roads, developed areas, irrigation and drainage ditches, and areas with impacted soils.
|
foraging
|
size of foraging area is unknown, may be related to available food supply and available suitable soils; diversity of resources is important
|
plant locations
|
not applicable
|
wintering
|
not applicable
|
migratory stops
|
not applicable
|
diurnal preferences - day, temporary
|
uses rodent burrows and litter (e.g., boards) as shelter for unknown periods of time; rodents have largely been eradicated as a result of agricultural and urban development from areas where this snake once lived
|
diurnal preferences - day, long-term
|
rodent burrows and litter
|
diurnal preferences - night
|
rodent burrows and litter
|
fire threat
|
may be a threat if it results in loss or conversion of vegetation; direct effects of fire on snake are unknown, probably lethal under some circumstances, not under others
|
HABITAT ALTERATION
|
|
prey
|
consumes diverse invertebrate prey; loss or reduction of populations of suitable prey species through habitat loss and invasive competitors is probably a significant threat, but needs further research
|
nest sites
|
rodent burrows and litter
|
vegetation composition/density
|
loss of native desert vegetation by conversion to agricultural fields was important cause of population loss
|
HABITAT ALTERATION continued
|
habitat conversion
|
loss of native desert vegetation by conversion to agricultural fields was important cause of population loss
|
escape cover
|
rodent burrows and litter
|
fragmentation
|
fragmentation of historic habitat may have led or contributed to endangerment of this species; remaining potentially suitable areas are isolated by various barriers
|
invasive plant species
|
invasion by mesquite, bufflegrass, and red brome reduces vegetation diversity and can lead to fires, changes in soil characteristics, and prey availability
|
invasive animal species
|
effects are unknown, but concern has been expressed about invasive non-native insects such as cockroaches out-competing native food animals
|
habitat rehabilitation potential
|
questionable: anything that restores native vegetation is probably good; habitat rehabilitation to enhance connectivity may improve long-term survival if the species is present or reintroduced
|
contaminants
|
unknown
|
nutrient enrichment
|
probably irrelevant
|
water accessibility
|
probably irrelevant
|
drought
|
may result in reduction of prey populations
|
flood
|
probably irrelevant
|
groundwater depletion
|
probably irrelevant
|
root zone water loss
|
probably irrelevant
|
artificial water sources
|
probably irrelevant
|
infiltration
|
probably irrelevant
|
runoff
|
probably irrelevant
|
edge effects
|
unknown, but may contribute to isolation and predation on snake
|
fire threat
|
may be a threat if it results in loss or conversion of vegetation; direct effects of fire on snake are unknown, probably lethal under some circumstances, not under others
|
HABITAT ALTERATION continued
|
water quality - turbidity
|
probably irrelevant
|
water quality - salinity
|
probably irrelevant; but may result in changes in soils and invertebrate community
|
water quality - conductivity
|
probably irrelevant
|
water quality - dissolved oxygen
|
probably irrelevant
|
water quality - effluent
|
probably irrelevant
|
sheetflow disruption
|
probably irrelevant; but may result in changes in soils and invertebrate community
|
flow rate
|
probably irrelevant
|
land use history
|
historic agricultural use may render land unsuitable for this species; long-term effects are unknown
|
roads - dust
|
probably irrelevant
|
roads - erosion
|
probably irrelevant
|
roads - surface water diversion/ponding
|
may have adverse impacts on prey availability very locally
|
roads - asphalt/contaminants
|
unknown
|
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
|
|
dispersal mechanism
|
moves overland, apparently preferring certain types of soil; dispersal may be impacted adversely by roads, ditches, and unsuitable areas
|
behavior traits
|
unknown
|
habitat rehabilitation potential
|
unknown-- habitat may have been altered in ways we do not understand that are important; goal is to restore fully functioning desert ecosystem to historically suitable habitat, but potential for success is unknown
|
colonization potential
|
unknown but probably very limited because of multiple barriers
|
effective population size
|
unknown
|
total population size
|
unknown
|
fecundity
|
not considered a problem, although long-term survival may be a problem
|
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS continued
|
knowledge/data on species
|
essentially nothing is known about demographics or population dynamics; specific habitat requirements are not known, other than undisturbed desert community
|
seasonal specialization
|
unknown, prey animals are clearly seasonal in abundance and life cycle, so snake must have the ability to switch prey or fast and gorge
|
captive breeding/translocation potential
|
unknown, but may be a useful approach
|
genetic isolation
|
may be a problem
|
inbreeding
|
may be a problem
|
diurnal specialization
|
not considered to be a problem
|
off-site mortality - migratory
|
no information is available
|
off-site mortality - from surrounding land uses
|
no information is available
|
breadth of resource use
|
appears to have specialization to a narrow range of resources, but this is not well understood yet
|
sensitivity to disturbance
|
unknown
|
adaptability
|
fairly limited in habitat selection to specific soil types
|
charisma
|
not very charismatic, except to a few people
|
INTERSPECIFIC FACTORS
|
|
predation
|
unknown
|
disease
|
unknown
|
pollinators/seed dispersers
|
not applicable
|
competition
|
unknown
|
brood parasitism
|
not applicable
|
domestic/feral animals
|
not likely to be a problem
|
invasive species
|
effects unknown, invasive plants alter habitat adversely; invasive insects may alter prey base
|
ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS
|
|
edge effect
|
unknown
|
disease
|
unknown
|
fire threat
|
may be a threat if it results in loss or conversion of vegetation; direct effects of fire on snake are unknown, probably lethal under some circumstances, not under others
|
off-road vehicles - dust
|
not considered a problem
|
off-road vehicles - erosion
|
not considered a problem
|
off-road vehicles - noise
|
direct impacts to snakes, and impacts to soils may be adverse
|
mining
|
not considered a problem
|
passive recreation
|
not considered a problem
|
grazing - vegetation impacts
|
may be harmful if it reduces vegetation diversity
|
grazing - soil impacts
|
may be harmful if it compacts soil
|
collection/hunting
|
historically may have been a problem in that snakes in the area have been collected; no longer considered a problem because snakes have not recently been found in area
|
herbicides
|
|
insecticides
|
not thought to be a problem, except as they may affect prey base
|
pesticides - impacts to species
|
not considered a problem
|
pesticides - impacts to prey
|
may be a problem, but effects are unknown
|
direct take/mortality
|
not considered a problem
|
noise
|
not considered a problem
|
light
|
not considered a problem
|
movement
|
not considered a problem
|
landscaping
|
not considered a problem
|
invasives
|
may be a problem
|
domestic/feral animals
|
unknown
|
ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS continued
|
dumping
|
not considered a problem, may actually be beneficial by providing cover
|
undocumented immigrants
|
not considered a problem, may actually be beneficial by providing cover in the form of litter
|
increased road density
|
results in loss of habitat, barriers to dispersal, and direct mortality
|
road kill
|
serious problem, at least historically
|
electrocution on powerlines/towers
|
not applicable
|
CONNECTIVITY
|
|
fragmentation
|
this is probably a significant problem because the only remaining habitat is isolated
|
barriers
|
roads, ditches, agricultural fields, urban development, unsuitable habitat
|
traffic volumes
|
may be problematic by increasing roadkill risk
|
wash incision
|
unknown
|
corridor width
|
unknown
|
habitat patchiness
|
connectivity is considered crucial
|
riparian/upland connection
|
unknown
|
road crossings
|
may be hazardous
|
road width
|
unknown, presumably wider roads are worse than narrower roads
|
vegetation next to roads
|
probably irrelevant
|
|
|
Stressors/Threats
|
Relevance to Species
|
HABITAT LOSS
|
foraging
|
size of foraging area is unknown, but will forage over large distances; thought to prefer "edges" of habitat
|
wintering
|
winter roosts are generally caves or mines, threatened by closure
|
migratory stops
|
roosts are necessary for migrants
|
diurnal preferences - day, temporary
|
unknown and unlikely
|
diurnal preferences - day, long-term
|
caves and mines are extremely important
|
diurnal preferences - night
|
needed, includes bridges, buildings, drainage culverts?, and other unknown
|
fire threat
|
probably minor
|
HABITAT ALTERATION
|
prey
|
moths, 3-10 mm, Noctuidae; but includes other insects; loss of prey= loss of bats
|
nest sites
|
maternity roosts critically important
|
vegetation composition/density
|
important as source of prey; protect riparian and other edges
|
fragmentation
|
potentially does not matter, it lives in a fragmented landscape
|
invasive plant species
|
unknown, probably affects prey base
|
habitat rehabilitaion potential
|
limited for roosts; conditions needed are generally unknown; gating roosts could be beneficial
|
contaminents
|
unknown; there is some indication that bats can acquire toxic materials in roosts, and considerable evidence that some species can acquire toxic doses of insecticides by consuming contaminated prey
|
water accessibility
|
drinks from and forages over water; very small water sources are used, large water bodies have not been surveyed; could benefit by vegetation around water
|
artifical water sources
|
drinks from and forages over water; very small water sources are used, large water bodies have not been surveyed; could benefit by vegetation around water
|
edge effects
|
prefers foraging along edges
|
fire threat
|
may affect prey
|
water quality - turbidity
|
broadly tolerant of water quality
|
flow rate
|
may prefer still or slow moving water
|
roads - surface water diversion/ponding
|
may be beneficial
|
SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS
|
behavior traits
|
sensitive to disturbance at roosts
|
habitat rehabiitation potential
|
potential to increase prey base; could benefit by gating mines and caves; experiment with creating habitat?
|
fecundity
|
1 young per year, fecundity is low as with most bats
|
captive breeding/translocation potential
|
no success with moving from roosts
|
inbreeding
|
very low variability suggests inbreeding or small gene pool
|
off-site mortality - from surrounding land uses
|
could be driven from areas by renewed mining, urban expansion, human disturbance
|
sensitivity to disturbance
|
highly sensitive; outreach to recreational cavers and mine explorers is needed
|
adaptibility
|
not very adaptable to some changes, especially loss of roosts
|
charisma
|
mixed bag: bats have had a major change in public image in past two decades but some people still fear or hate; need to empasize that they eat pest insects
|
INTERSPECIFIC FACTORS
|
predation
|
limited knowledge; may be subject to predation by cats but this is not likely
|
disease
|
rabies may affect; others unknown
|
competition
|
unknown; has been found in roosts with other species
|
domestic/feral animals
|
may be preyed on by cats, but this is not likely
|
ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS
|
edge effect
|
edges are prefered foraging sites
|
off-road vehicles - dust
|
ORVs may be a problem because they get people to roost sites and result in disturbance
|
mining
|
renewed mining in areas with old mines may result in disturbance or loss of roosts
|
passive recreation
|
disturbance of roosts; should route trails to avoid roosts
|
grazing - vegetation impacts
|
may affect prey base
|
collection/hunting
|
not thought to be a problem
|
herbicides
|
not thought to be a problem, except as they may affect prey base
|
insecticides
|
impacts have been reduced over time, but still may be a problem
|
pesticides - impacts to species
|
impacts have been reduced over time, but still may be a problem
|
pesticides - impacts to prey
|
this could be significant
|
direct take/mortality
|
little effect except from mine hazard abatement practices, which could be serious impacts; road paving and de-icing may affect
|
light
|
bright lights near roosts may affect
|
landscaping
|
native plants could provide beneficial opportunities for habitat improvement
|
dumping
|
may affect if in roost sites
|
undocumented immigrants
|
may affect when they use caves and mines for shelter or dumping grounds
|
increased road density
|
may be a problem, low-flying bats could get hit by cars while foraging along road edges
|
road kill
|
may be a problem, low-flying bats could get hit by cars while foraging along road edges
|
CONNECTIVITY
|
barriers
|
large cities with abundant lights could be barriers
|
traffic volumes
|
increased volume could lead to increased road kill
|
wash incision
|
could create roost sites but could also take some away
|
corridor width
|
buffers along washes would be good but width unknown
|
habitat patchiness
|
depend on what is around them; patchiness could be good because it could increase insect diversity
|
riparian/upland connection
|
bridges could be improved as bat roosts
|
road crossings
|
could be opportunity for foraging or hazard due to roadkill
|
vegetation next to roads
|
could be opportunity or hazard; recommend not planting edges along larger and faster roads, allow space between trees and roads
|